19 User(s) làđọc chủ đề này 30 phút vừa qua
0Thành viên19 Khách
0Thành viên19 Khách
Lo más popular ahora:
AoKTS updates (72 usuarios)
1.6 reward campaing (48 usuarios)
CBA PathBlood 1.8.0 (32 usuarios)
#ReviveCS - Proposal (27 usuarios)
Word Association (19 usuarios)
CBA HERO v18 (16 usuarios)
Setting up port forwarding in ro... (13 usuarios)
Temas más activos de la semana:
#ReviveCS - Proposal (45 mensajes)
New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (8 mensajes)
my version shows as 1.0C and oth... (7 mensajes)
Voobly disappearing without erro... (7 mensajes)
AYUDA!! LOST CONNECTION TO THE S... (6 mensajes)
1.6 Out of sync without any play... (4 mensajes)
Who vs? challenge to Boobly 2v2 (3 mensajes)
circumstantial -> tardiness
Dependent was the most recent participant word.
Singular
(A matrix is singular iff its rows/columns are linearly dependent)
Obviously you're correct in that something circumstantial is dependent on different things but that's step three. Something needs to be circumstantial before we can say the word dependent. I thought about this before I wrote that. I should've wrote directly related above.
Obviously you're correct in that something circumstantial is dependent on different things but that's step three. Something needs to be circumstantial before we can say the word dependent. I thought about this before I wrote that. I should've wrote directly related above.
I already stated above that something that's circumstantial is dependent but this is after the fact. First, imo, something that is circumstantial needs to be specified in order for the word dependent to be put into play. And you can't say the word dependent at any time... not if it's been said recently per the rules you made in the original post. I think the main issue I'm having is that they're both adjectives and shouldn't directly lead to each other like I said before.
particular
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
At any rate, for the sake of keeping this moving, I will accept particular.
Existence
I'm not sure how this thread will ever end...
I'm used to cause and effect.... not cause, effect, and back to cause.
(e.g. AB -> A + B compared to AB -> A + B -> C ... where C would be another reactant not directly related to A and B other than it being another subject/noun/group/adjective...)